The Canadian Guitar Forum banner

Would you rather....

3.1K views 37 replies 23 participants last post by  jimmythegeek  
#1 ·
Incredibly artificial scenario, I know, but what they hey.

Would you rather:

a) Be a lead guitarist with a solid rhythm player behind you, regardless of your own level of skill?

OR

b) Be a rhythm player behind a really good lead player?

I'm assuming this is within the context of a minimum 4-piece band. No power trios allowed.
 
#5 ·
Tough question Mark. In the classic country trio i play in, the signer is a solid acoustic player and really fills up all the holes while i noodle around. Having said that, i have had the extreme pleasure of tagging along on rythm with some Ottawa's best pickers and found it very fulfilling. My other pop rock band i play in, i am the only guitarist so get to do it all.
 
#6 ·
Tough question.

In my last cover band, the singer/bandleader played rhythm but still depended on me to carry most of the rhythm and all the lead chores (except when the lead was played by the keys or blues harp player when we had either. In reality, I think of the rhythm and lead as being combined as that's most of my experience. The secret is knowing where to economize.

If I had to choose from the stated choices, I guess I'd be the solid rhythm player like I am in my fiddle/guitar duo where I play a zillion chords and rhythms behind the stellar melody player. My job is way more fun than either having to memorize or read melodies at the speed of light. We could easily add two more pieces (say any of vocals, drums, keys, and bass for example) without affecting my role very much.
 
#11 ·
At my weekly lesson last night my instructor had me playing a lick over and over again but wanted me to try to alter my phrasing every time through the lick. While I was doing that he started playing chord progressions to try to put the lick into context and highlight different tones at different times...it was awesome! Doing something like that really drives home how important rhythm can be because it felt like he was playing "lead" with his choice of chords.

This stuff just blows my mind sometimes!

Anyway, to answer the question, I'd be more than happy to be a solid rhythm player behind a shit hot lead player...let him get all the girls...I'm happily married and can't afford a divorce.
 
#13 · (Edited)
One of my guitar heroes is Steve Cropper; primarily rhythm, with fills here and there that "complete" songs.
I met the Colonel in the Nashville airport around 2015. I have a picture somewhere.

He was very gracious and seemed to appreciate my condolences on the loss of his buddy Donald Duck Dunn.

The funny thing was, I was sitting in first class and he was in coach. A flight attendant stopped to tell me there was some " rock celebrity" on board and asked if it was me.

Face palm moment.

Edit: Turns out it was 2012. See below
 
#26 ·
(Hmmm, never hit this "ignore" feature before... wonder what it does?)

COOL!
I mean Milkman can be a bit of a drama queen but I don’t think it’s necessary for you to put him on the ignore list. Heck, if a snowflake millennial like myself can deal with it, I’m sure a tough as nails manly boomer adult like yourself can deal with his little internet antics. No?
 
#30 ·
I'm happy in either role, and I hope the other guitar player is as well. So:

c) both can play rhythm and lead equally comfortably and swap back and forth. They don't have to be great at both, but both have to be capable of holding their end up, and hopefully have their own things to play/say, complementing each other.


What I will absolutely not tolerate is:

d) playing with a guy who can only play lead/solos, can't play any rhythm and insists on noodling over everything else, from the singer to the harp player to the key's solos to the other guitar player's solos.

That is not a situation I will abide for long and will usually end up with me taking a break until the self-appointed soloist takes a break. And he usually suffers badly without a rhythm player to lean on - the songs usually fall apart.
 
#34 ·
My goal/desire/preference from way back in high school was to be primarily the rhythm guitarist--I love cranking out power chords & regular ones as well.

Give me a lead part & solo here & there--and some co-leads, sure, but mostly let me play chords or riffs.

That was my plan way back when--and so while the band thing never worked out I still feel that way, which is probably why I wound up playing bass more often recently.
Of course you need a good lead player--who has a good sense of timing/rhythm.
(Although I had one telling me I had the timing wrong on a riff I wrote--I mean I wrote the riff--that's the timing. He didn't mean-"It might sound better if you played it this way" he meant I was wrong)
 
  • Like
Reactions: gtrguy