david henman said:
...yes, sir!
:tongue:
by the way, i don't think anyone here has actually attempted to explain why spanking is a good idea, much less a better idea than patience, communication and no-always-means-no discipline.
-dh
I think some of the posts attempted to.
Of course, every child is different, and every circumstance is different...no one is going to argue that a spanking is the end-all be-all of discipline for every offense.
A very willful child might need a smack here and there...and some children respond very well to withdrawl of priveleges and debate.
When a child is a little older discussing the issue and trying to make them see WHY throwing a ball around the house is not acceptable behavior can be effective. It's even MORE effective if they respect their parent(s) already. At some point many children start to challenge authority, and debating the issue with them usually results in someone getting called a "poopyhead".
david henman said:
...are you sure?
does anyone have access to studies and stats?
in any case, if spanking is not more effective than not spanking, doesn't that actually beg the question?
-dh
I see your call for stats and studies and counter with the same. Where are the true scientific studies done with double blinds and administered by a neutral party that claim not-spanking children is the best method of rearing them? Good luck!
"Wanted: young children to participate in a spanking study."
