Joined
·
194 Posts
I’ve owned one Agile, but a Telecaster style, and it was a very nice guitar. I’ve followed the brand over the years and went to the Rondo store once. It’s great that players have this quality at its price point, and a good Agile can be better than a poor Gibson, assuming you like the pickup voicings equally. But I would think that Epiphone is the more direct competitor.
Does a good Gibson warrant the difference in price? I think yes for at least a large portion of that difference. Though I’m quite critical of Gibson at times (“petty” was a word I used here recently), I respect the legacy and the fact that they made the LP design for which Agile is most known. I accept the fact that labour and manufacturing costs are more expensive in North America, but I value supporting that labour (which is not anti-anyone else).
And while resale value is not an intrinsic instrument quality, it does matter. If you love an Agile and keep it, that’s a great deal. If you buy a Gibson, sell it for a good return, and buy another quality instrument (especially that is part of your regional economy), that’s a good deal too.
Does a good Gibson warrant the difference in price? I think yes for at least a large portion of that difference. Though I’m quite critical of Gibson at times (“petty” was a word I used here recently), I respect the legacy and the fact that they made the LP design for which Agile is most known. I accept the fact that labour and manufacturing costs are more expensive in North America, but I value supporting that labour (which is not anti-anyone else).
And while resale value is not an intrinsic instrument quality, it does matter. If you love an Agile and keep it, that’s a great deal. If you buy a Gibson, sell it for a good return, and buy another quality instrument (especially that is part of your regional economy), that’s a good deal too.