as sure as eggs is eggs...

This is similar:

Human transgenerational responses to early-life experience: potential impact on development, health and biomedical research.

Review: Human transgenerational responses to early-life experience: potential impact on development, health and biomedical research
Mammalian experiments provide clear evidence of male line transgenerational effects on health and development from paternal or ancestral early-life exposures such as diet or stress. The few human observational studies to date suggest (male line) transgenerational effects exist that cannot easily be attributed to cultural and/or genetic inheritance. Here we summarise relevant studies, drawing attention to exposure sensitive periods in early life and sex differences in transmission and offspring outcomes. Thus, variation, or changes, in the parental/ancestral environment may influence phenotypic variation for better or worse in the next generation(s), and so contribute to common, non-communicable disease risk including sex differences. We argue that life-course epidemiology should be reframed to include exposures from previous generations, keeping an open mind as to the mechanisms that transmit this information to offspring. Finally, we discuss animal experiments, including the role of epigenetic inheritance and non-coding RNAs, in terms of what lessons can be learnt for designing and interpreting human studies.

Electraglide said:

Maybe it was the Quakers or the Shakers.

Click to expand...

Ha ha... Nice try on the gaslighting.

Human transgenerational responses to early-life experience: potential impact on development, health and biomedical research.

Review: Human transgenerational responses to early-life experience: potential impact on development, health and biomedical research
Mammalian experiments provide clear evidence of male line transgenerational effects on health and development from paternal or ancestral early-life exposures such as diet or stress. The few human observational studies to date suggest (male line) transgenerational effects exist that cannot easily be attributed to cultural and/or genetic inheritance. Here we summarise relevant studies, drawing attention to exposure sensitive periods in early life and sex differences in transmission and offspring outcomes. Thus, variation, or changes, in the parental/ancestral environment may influence phenotypic variation for better or worse in the next generation(s), and so contribute to common, non-communicable disease risk including sex differences. We argue that life-course epidemiology should be reframed to include exposures from previous generations, keeping an open mind as to the mechanisms that transmit this information to offspring. Finally, we discuss animal experiments, including the role of epigenetic inheritance and non-coding RNAs, in terms of what lessons can be learned for designing and interpreting human studies.

My wife keeps horse on the farm just outside the village. She came home with these.

Guitar101 said:

A promise is a promise.

(from Grandpa by the Judds)
Did lovers really fall in love to stay
And stand beside each other, come what may?
Was a promise really something people kept
Not just something they would say and then forget.

Click to expand...

Not long after this it was over....again. Promise, like love is just another word.
To answer an age old question.