The Canadian Guitar Forum banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,974 Posts
Yes, its a far cry from when he was obsessed with trying to push his religion down American's throats. He has a great PR team thats for sure.............
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,974 Posts
The ones on Gore's side are also the ones who protested against nuclear power and prevented plants being built in the 1970s to shut down the coal fired ones. The US hasnt built a new nuclear power plant since 1978. And now they complain about what they created. The same thing will happen here with global warming. Its all part of combining the logic tree and Sturgeons Law...........
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,974 Posts
Remember all the scientists that thought the earth was flat, that Bode's Law was correct, that Pluto was a planet, that found a cure for AIDS or cancer? Science history is filled with this stuff, and watch out what kind of science they are in. We have political science, social science, meteorology, climatologists. Some of these hardly qualify as scientists but are used by the IPCC to back up their claim. Sometimes people can be swayed by funding. I am on the denier side, because its the side that says we dont have all the answers. The other side says yup we do, just look at our models and theories. Models and theories arent facts. Sometimes facts arent facts. I do know we are on a wobbly rock hurdling through space with only gravitational pull keeping us in orbit. That in itself lends the fact that climate will always change, because the angle, intensity and distance of rays are always changing. You'd be amazed at how much difference 1 degree of angle will do to the climate, yet it isnt in any of their models. Neither is the impact of higher dementional forces. Its funny that we study the impact of those forces on other planets climate, but it seems odd that its impact on our climate is somehow missed in any discussion by the IPCC. It was first studied in the early 90s on the poles, but the conclusions of these studies dont agree with the IPCC so they take any reference to it out..........
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top