zontar
01-31-2008, 10:00 PM
Starting back before I got my Iceman, and through into the 80's I frequented guitar stores at least weekly. I read every issue of Guitar Player, and checked up on what guitars were out there. Well, I wound up with an Iceman, and a Mustang--and slightly after this a Les Paul. But recent posts here, and some guitar surfing on various sites has reminded me of a few other guitars I remember trying out, but not buying.
In no particular order-
The Fender Performer (http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Performing-Arts/Music/Instruments/String/Guitars/Electric-Guitar/Fender/Fender-41.html)
These weren't bad, but I thought overpriced for what they were. I guess Strats weren't cool enough then. Too bad. I basically saw them as Strats with humbuckers and a slightly different body. I didn't find them that comfortable to hold.
Musicman Stingrayad here. (http://www.vintageguitars.org.uk/adDetails/214)
and the Sabre. (http://www.vintageguitars.org.uk/adDetails/211)
I actually found these quite comfortable to play--when I could find them with a rosewood neck. But the necks on the ones I tried seemed weak. And they didn't seem to stay in tune very well--I did like the sound though
Peavey T-60 (http://www.rockandrollweekend.com/T-60%20all%20three%20-%20tops.jpg). I mentioned these in a Peavey thread--If I'd bought one of these it would have predated the Iceman. I did consider getting one, but while the sound was good, it wasn't quite me. They seemed well made, sturdy, I liked the necks. And the tone control actually changed the pickup from a single coil to a humbucker and back again.
The Gibson Victory (http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/780/618090.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Performing-Arts/Music/Instruments/String/Guitars/Electric-Guitar/Gibson/Gibson-048.html&h=200&w=426&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=7_fupsPkHI_fKM:&tbnh=59&tbnw=126&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgibson%2Bvictory%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%2 6sa%3DN) was supposed to offer a wide variety of tones--but many of them ere barely different than others, and some were useless to me, but ultimately I didn't think the guitar was worth the price. The Fender Performer was better.
And one of the ugliest production Gibsons ever, the Corvus (http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3865/1712/1600/gibsoncorvusIII.1.jpg)
It was known, affectionately by some, as the can opener. I'd rather have a Moderne. (http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/780/616607.JPG) (Gibson finally made them in the early 80's. They looked cool. (I never played a Gibson one, but I did try an Ibanez one--I wish I'd bought it.) But beyond the look, the Corvus' shape made it awkward to play--at least I thought so. And at the age I was then--the shape didn't cut it.
History has a way of "disposing" of guitars that seemed like a good idea at the time, and some that were good ideas-but the world wasn't ready for them.
Anybody remember these, own one, or have others from their history? (Be they good, bad or ugly)
In no particular order-
The Fender Performer (http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Performing-Arts/Music/Instruments/String/Guitars/Electric-Guitar/Fender/Fender-41.html)
These weren't bad, but I thought overpriced for what they were. I guess Strats weren't cool enough then. Too bad. I basically saw them as Strats with humbuckers and a slightly different body. I didn't find them that comfortable to hold.
Musicman Stingrayad here. (http://www.vintageguitars.org.uk/adDetails/214)
and the Sabre. (http://www.vintageguitars.org.uk/adDetails/211)
I actually found these quite comfortable to play--when I could find them with a rosewood neck. But the necks on the ones I tried seemed weak. And they didn't seem to stay in tune very well--I did like the sound though
Peavey T-60 (http://www.rockandrollweekend.com/T-60%20all%20three%20-%20tops.jpg). I mentioned these in a Peavey thread--If I'd bought one of these it would have predated the Iceman. I did consider getting one, but while the sound was good, it wasn't quite me. They seemed well made, sturdy, I liked the necks. And the tone control actually changed the pickup from a single coil to a humbucker and back again.
The Gibson Victory (http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/780/618090.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Performing-Arts/Music/Instruments/String/Guitars/Electric-Guitar/Gibson/Gibson-048.html&h=200&w=426&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=7_fupsPkHI_fKM:&tbnh=59&tbnw=126&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgibson%2Bvictory%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%2 6sa%3DN) was supposed to offer a wide variety of tones--but many of them ere barely different than others, and some were useless to me, but ultimately I didn't think the guitar was worth the price. The Fender Performer was better.
And one of the ugliest production Gibsons ever, the Corvus (http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3865/1712/1600/gibsoncorvusIII.1.jpg)
It was known, affectionately by some, as the can opener. I'd rather have a Moderne. (http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/780/616607.JPG) (Gibson finally made them in the early 80's. They looked cool. (I never played a Gibson one, but I did try an Ibanez one--I wish I'd bought it.) But beyond the look, the Corvus' shape made it awkward to play--at least I thought so. And at the age I was then--the shape didn't cut it.
History has a way of "disposing" of guitars that seemed like a good idea at the time, and some that were good ideas-but the world wasn't ready for them.
Anybody remember these, own one, or have others from their history? (Be they good, bad or ugly)